https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263185 The scope of the Commissioner (Appeals)' authority under Section 35A(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994, as applicable before 11.05.2011, did not permit a challenge to the remand order on the ground that remand power had been withdrawn. Following the binding view in Medico Labs, the Tribunal accepted that the Commissioner (Appeals) suffered no legal infirmity in remanding the matter for de novo adjudication, and the Revenue's objection was rejected. en-us Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:51:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263185 The scope of the Commissioner (Appeals)' authority under Section 35A(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994, as applicable before 11.05.2011, did not permit a challenge to the remand order on the ground that remand power had been withdrawn. Following the binding view in Medico Labs, the Tribunal accepted that the Commissioner (Appeals) suffered no legal infirmity in remanding the matter for de novo adjudication, and the Revenue's objection was rejected. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263185