<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1095 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263178</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, setting aside several issues for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) due to lack of cooperation and documentation from the assessee. The Tribunal upheld some additions and deletions by the CIT(A), emphasizing the importance of proper compliance and documentation. Penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were found premature and dismissed without adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1095 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263178</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, setting aside several issues for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) due to lack of cooperation and documentation from the assessee. The Tribunal upheld some additions and deletions by the CIT(A), emphasizing the importance of proper compliance and documentation. Penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were found premature and dismissed without adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>