https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29 The Court upheld the order demanding service tax and penalties, ruling that the petitioner-Company was classified as a 'consulting engineer' under the Finance Act, 1994, and thus liable for service tax. The Court also held that service tax applied to Computer Software Development Industries, rejecting the argument for retrospective application of an exemption notification. The petitioner was directed to pay service tax for the relevant period, with an interim order continuation granted for eight weeks to seek relief from the Appellate Court. en-us Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29 The Court upheld the order demanding service tax and penalties, ruling that the petitioner-Company was classified as a 'consulting engineer' under the Finance Act, 1994, and thus liable for service tax. The Court also held that service tax applied to Computer Software Development Industries, rejecting the argument for retrospective application of an exemption notification. The petitioner was directed to pay service tax for the relevant period, with an interim order continuation granted for eight weeks to seek relief from the Appellate Court. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29