<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1087 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), confirming that the Assessing Officer incorrectly valued the assets without sufficient evidence. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not refer the matter to the Valuation Officer or provide material evidence supporting the excessive valuations. The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:48:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1087 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), confirming that the Assessing Officer incorrectly valued the assets without sufficient evidence. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not refer the matter to the Valuation Officer or provide material evidence supporting the excessive valuations. The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>