<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 517 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172699</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court recorded that the interlocutory application was allowed and the civil appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in a Central Excise matter. The text does not set out any substantive legal determination on classification, duty liability, or other excise issues, so no doctrinal holding can be extracted from the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:55:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 517 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172699</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court recorded that the interlocutory application was allowed and the civil appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in a Central Excise matter. The text does not set out any substantive legal determination on classification, duty liability, or other excise issues, so no doctrinal holding can be extracted from the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>