https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172694 Curtailment of stage carriage permits was held to offend Article 14 where similarly situated operators on overlapping routes were left unaffected. The discriminatory treatment arose from omission or error in supplying complete permit particulars to the deciding authority, but that oversight could not justify unequal treatment under the approved scheme. The Court did not strike down the scheme as a whole; instead, it removed the discriminatory effect by quashing the curtailment conditions against the petitioners to the extent they denied equal treatment, until comparable restrictions were applied uniformly to all similarly placed operators. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172694 Curtailment of stage carriage permits was held to offend Article 14 where similarly situated operators on overlapping routes were left unaffected. The discriminatory treatment arose from omission or error in supplying complete permit particulars to the deciding authority, but that oversight could not justify unequal treatment under the approved scheme. The Court did not strike down the scheme as a whole; instead, it removed the discriminatory effect by quashing the curtailment conditions against the petitioners to the extent they denied equal treatment, until comparable restrictions were applied uniformly to all similarly placed operators. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172694