<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 186 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172692</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the levy of an assessed fee on FL-2 wholesale liquor licences in addition to the auction money fixed fee, holding that the post-1976 scheme of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 and the amended rules authorised licence consideration to be determined by auction and by an additional sales-based component. The phrase &quot;or otherwise&quot; in Section 30(2) was read broadly, and the later amendment was treated as clarificatory rather than conferring a new power. The Court further held that bidders had notice through the amended rules and licence condition, and that the Excise Commissioner&#039;s prescribed scales were attributable to the State Government.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 186 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172692</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the levy of an assessed fee on FL-2 wholesale liquor licences in addition to the auction money fixed fee, holding that the post-1976 scheme of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 and the amended rules authorised licence consideration to be determined by auction and by an additional sales-based component. The phrase &quot;or otherwise&quot; in Section 30(2) was read broadly, and the later amendment was treated as clarificatory rather than conferring a new power. The Court further held that bidders had notice through the amended rules and licence condition, and that the Excise Commissioner&#039;s prescribed scales were attributable to the State Government.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>