https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263158 The Court clarified that the Tribunal has the discretion to grant an interim order exceeding 365 days if it serves the interest of justice, despite the statutory limit under Section 35-C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It emphasized the need for expeditious appeal disposal, directing the Tribunal to decide cases within six months of judgment. The Court referenced a prior case to support the Tribunal's authority to consider fresh interim stay applications post the 365-day period, ensuring timely resolution of legal disputes while maintaining procedural fairness. en-us Tue, 19 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:25:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263158 The Court clarified that the Tribunal has the discretion to grant an interim order exceeding 365 days if it serves the interest of justice, despite the statutory limit under Section 35-C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It emphasized the need for expeditious appeal disposal, directing the Tribunal to decide cases within six months of judgment. The Court referenced a prior case to support the Tribunal's authority to consider fresh interim stay applications post the 365-day period, ensuring timely resolution of legal disputes while maintaining procedural fairness. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263158