<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 827 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24</link>
    <description>Delayed filing of ST-3 returns under the Finance Act, 1994 attracted penalty under section 77, but the Tribunal applied its earlier precedent and confined the levy to the minimum prescribed amount of Rs. 100 per week for the period of delay. The penalty originally imposed at Rs. 7,700 was therefore recalculated on the basis of the actual delay and restricted to Rs. 1,100, granting the assessee partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 827 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24</link>
      <description>Delayed filing of ST-3 returns under the Finance Act, 1994 attracted penalty under section 77, but the Tribunal applied its earlier precedent and confined the levy to the minimum prescribed amount of Rs. 100 per week for the period of delay. The penalty originally imposed at Rs. 7,700 was therefore recalculated on the basis of the actual delay and restricted to Rs. 1,100, granting the assessee partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>