<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1070 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263153</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of the confirmed service tax demand was waived and recovery was stayed because a prior High Court view existed on the same issue. The order reflects that, where the dispute is already covered by an earlier High Court position, the tribunal may grant interim protection by dispensing with the deposit requirement and restraining recovery pending further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:05:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1070 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263153</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of the confirmed service tax demand was waived and recovery was stayed because a prior High Court view existed on the same issue. The order reflects that, where the dispute is already covered by an earlier High Court position, the tribunal may grant interim protection by dispensing with the deposit requirement and restraining recovery pending further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>