<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 633 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee in part. It directed the deletion of disallowances related to vehicle and telephone expenses due to lack of proper records, as well as prior period expenses. Additionally, it remitted the matter of adjusting carried forward book losses and depreciation for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) purposes back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, finding the methodology adopted by the Assessing Officer to be incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:47:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 633 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee in part. It directed the deletion of disallowances related to vehicle and telephone expenses due to lack of proper records, as well as prior period expenses. Additionally, it remitted the matter of adjusting carried forward book losses and depreciation for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) purposes back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, finding the methodology adopted by the Assessing Officer to be incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>