<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (5) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172667</link>
    <description>Bail already granted may be cancelled where subsequent conduct shows abuse of liberty, especially an attempt to tamper with prosecution witnesses and interfere with the administration of justice. In an application under section 439(2) CrPC, the prosecution need not prove witness-tampering beyond reasonable doubt; a preponderance of probabilities is sufficient. On the material before the Court, the complaints of approvers, corroborative affidavits and surrounding circumstances were treated as satisfactory proof of interference, so cancellation of bail was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:47:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (5) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172667</link>
      <description>Bail already granted may be cancelled where subsequent conduct shows abuse of liberty, especially an attempt to tamper with prosecution witnesses and interfere with the administration of justice. In an application under section 439(2) CrPC, the prosecution need not prove witness-tampering beyond reasonable doubt; a preponderance of probabilities is sufficient. On the material before the Court, the complaints of approvers, corroborative affidavits and surrounding circumstances were treated as satisfactory proof of interference, so cancellation of bail was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>