<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 325 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172665</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court orders in impugned appeals because respondents passed on octroi duty burden to consumers, making a refund unjust enrichment. Gram Panchayat entitled to collect octroi, and respondents are not entitled to refund. Appeals allowed, writ petitions dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:40:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 325 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172665</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court orders in impugned appeals because respondents passed on octroi duty burden to consumers, making a refund unjust enrichment. Gram Panchayat entitled to collect octroi, and respondents are not entitled to refund. Appeals allowed, writ petitions dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>