<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1064 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld that the replacement of machinery in textile mills constitutes capital expenditure, not deductible under sec.37 of the I.T. Act. The decision aligned with legal precedents and the High Court ruling, affirming that such replacements enhance production capacity, justifying the capital expenditure classification. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the capital nature of the expenditure on machinery replacement in textile mills.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1064 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld that the replacement of machinery in textile mills constitutes capital expenditure, not deductible under sec.37 of the I.T. Act. The decision aligned with legal precedents and the High Court ruling, affirming that such replacements enhance production capacity, justifying the capital expenditure classification. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the capital nature of the expenditure on machinery replacement in textile mills.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>