<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 1 - COMMISSIONER APPEAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16</link>
    <description>Penalty for delayed filing of service tax returns and delayed deposit of tax was held unsustainable where the assessee paid the tax with interest, had not collected it from clients, and was dealing with the levy in its first quarter of introduction. Section 68(3) supported delayed payment in the stated circumstances, and Section 80 permitted waiver of penalty on reasonable cause. On that basis, penalty under Sections 76 and 77 was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 1 - COMMISSIONER APPEAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16</link>
      <description>Penalty for delayed filing of service tax returns and delayed deposit of tax was held unsustainable where the assessee paid the tax with interest, had not collected it from clients, and was dealing with the levy in its first quarter of introduction. Section 68(3) supported delayed payment in the stated circumstances, and Section 80 permitted waiver of penalty on reasonable cause. On that basis, penalty under Sections 76 and 77 was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>