<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1018 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263101</link>
    <description>Income from inland transportation of cargo within India was considered under Article 8(2)(b)(ii) and Article 8(2)(c) of the India-Belgium tax treaty. The Court noted that the issue was already covered by its earlier binding decision on the same legal question, and the parties accepted that position. On that basis, the appeals were not entertained and were disposed of without examination of the treaty merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:27:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1018 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263101</link>
      <description>Income from inland transportation of cargo within India was considered under Article 8(2)(b)(ii) and Article 8(2)(c) of the India-Belgium tax treaty. The Court noted that the issue was already covered by its earlier binding decision on the same legal question, and the parties accepted that position. On that basis, the appeals were not entertained and were disposed of without examination of the treaty merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>