<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 2 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12</link>
    <description>Section 72 best-judgment assessment required the order to record rejection of accounts as incorrect or incomplete and to explain the basis for treating brokerage as taxable service. The Tribunal found those foundational findings absent, and also held that Section 67 does not create a deeming provision that automatically fixes valuation of taxable service. Because the assessment order lacked the necessary factual and legal reasoning, unconditional stay was granted. The SC upheld that approach and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 2 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12</link>
      <description>Section 72 best-judgment assessment required the order to record rejection of accounts as incorrect or incomplete and to explain the basis for treating brokerage as taxable service. The Tribunal found those foundational findings absent, and also held that Section 67 does not create a deeming provision that automatically fixes valuation of taxable service. Because the assessment order lacked the necessary factual and legal reasoning, unconditional stay was granted. The SC upheld that approach and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>