https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172653 A Government notification extending an industrial bonus award under section 114(2) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act was held to be limited by the subject matter and reach of industrial adjudication; an award that could not be imposed against a party's will could not be made binding by executive notification, so the notification and the award founded on it were ultra vires. Delay, laches or acquiescence did not bar relief under Article 226 because certiorari is discretionary only where the delay amounts to waiver or inequitable prejudice, and the appellant had consistently contested enforcement. The impugned orders were set aside, while future or pending bonus references were left to be decided according to law. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172653 A Government notification extending an industrial bonus award under section 114(2) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act was held to be limited by the subject matter and reach of industrial adjudication; an award that could not be imposed against a party's will could not be made binding by executive notification, so the notification and the award founded on it were ultra vires. Delay, laches or acquiescence did not bar relief under Article 226 because certiorari is discretionary only where the delay amounts to waiver or inequitable prejudice, and the appellant had consistently contested enforcement. The impugned orders were set aside, while future or pending bonus references were left to be decided according to law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172653