<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1374 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172648</link>
    <description>Exemption under the notification was treated as available where the assessee filed a general declaration instead of a consignment-wise declaration stating that Cenvat credit was not available, because the authorities found substantial compliance with the procedural condition. The dispute was treated as factual rather than involving any substantial question of law, and the concurrent findings below were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1374 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172648</link>
      <description>Exemption under the notification was treated as available where the assessee filed a general declaration instead of a consignment-wise declaration stating that Cenvat credit was not available, because the authorities found substantial compliance with the procedural condition. The dispute was treated as factual rather than involving any substantial question of law, and the concurrent findings below were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>