<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 438 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172643</link>
    <description>Under a quota-based service rule, a direct recruit appointed on probation, even to an ex-cadre post, was treated as a member of the service from the date of initial appointment under the deeming provision. A promotee from Class II service, however, acquired service membership only on substantive appointment to a cadre post within quota; continued officiation or excess promotion outside quota did not suffice. The quota rule was mandatory, and temporary promotion beyond quota could not override seniority principles or confer seniority from the initial officiating date. The year of allotment for direct recruits and promotees had to be determined in accordance with the rules and the cadre vacancy structure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:00:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 438 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172643</link>
      <description>Under a quota-based service rule, a direct recruit appointed on probation, even to an ex-cadre post, was treated as a member of the service from the date of initial appointment under the deeming provision. A promotee from Class II service, however, acquired service membership only on substantive appointment to a cadre post within quota; continued officiation or excess promotion outside quota did not suffice. The quota rule was mandatory, and temporary promotion beyond quota could not override seniority principles or confer seniority from the initial officiating date. The year of allotment for direct recruits and promotees had to be determined in accordance with the rules and the cadre vacancy structure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>