<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (2) TMI 173 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172641</link>
    <description>After the 1956 amendment to the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, a pre-existing licensee could revise electricity charges under sections 57 and 57A read with the Sixth Schedule without a fresh rating committee fixing the tariff. The amended scheme was treated as incorporating the Sixth Schedule into earlier licences and as regulating the procedure for future revisions, not as extinguishing any vested right to continue earlier rates. The earlier licence terms and prior statutory procedure yielded to the extent of inconsistency with the amended provisions, and consumers had no enforceable right to insist on continuation of the 1952 rates until a new committee acted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:48:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (2) TMI 173 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172641</link>
      <description>After the 1956 amendment to the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, a pre-existing licensee could revise electricity charges under sections 57 and 57A read with the Sixth Schedule without a fresh rating committee fixing the tariff. The amended scheme was treated as incorporating the Sixth Schedule into earlier licences and as regulating the procedure for future revisions, not as extinguishing any vested right to continue earlier rates. The earlier licence terms and prior statutory procedure yielded to the extent of inconsistency with the amended provisions, and consumers had no enforceable right to insist on continuation of the 1952 rates until a new committee acted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>