https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172638 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals in a case involving Part-Time Lecturers seeking a proportionate increase in remuneration and asserting legal rights. The Court held that the appellants, engaged on a contractual basis, were not entitled to the minimum pay scale of regular Assistant Professors. It was clarified that the principles of equal pay for equal work did not apply in this context, as the appellants were not seeking absorption as regular teachers. The judgment emphasized the distinction between contractual engagements and regular appointments in determining entitlements. en-us Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172638 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals in a case involving Part-Time Lecturers seeking a proportionate increase in remuneration and asserting legal rights. The Court held that the appellants, engaged on a contractual basis, were not entitled to the minimum pay scale of regular Assistant Professors. It was clarified that the principles of equal pay for equal work did not apply in this context, as the appellants were not seeking absorption as regular teachers. The judgment emphasized the distinction between contractual engagements and regular appointments in determining entitlements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172638