<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 661 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172635</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the special leave petition was then dismissed. The text records only this procedural outcome and does not disclose any substantive legal reasoning on the central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 661 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172635</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the special leave petition was then dismissed. The text records only this procedural outcome and does not disclose any substantive legal reasoning on the central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>