<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1295 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172631</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, holding that the facts did not justify invocation of its extraordinary appellate power. It found no reason for further interference and concluded that the case did not warrant grant of special leave. The special leave petition was therefore dismissed, leaving the lower order undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2015 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1295 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172631</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, holding that the facts did not justify invocation of its extraordinary appellate power. It found no reason for further interference and concluded that the case did not warrant grant of special leave. The special leave petition was therefore dismissed, leaving the lower order undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>