https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172627 A statutory vesting order under a complete adjudicatory scheme could not be reviewed in the absence of express legislative authority, because review is not an inherent power and final orders under the Act had attained conclusiveness. The later review orders were therefore without jurisdiction. Although lack of jurisdiction is not cured by waiver, writ relief under article 226 remained discretionary, and petitioners who had allowed the original order to become final and themselves invoked an unauthorised review process were not entitled to certiorari. The High Court's interference was unsustainable and the original statutory orders stood restored in effect. en-us Tue, 19 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172627 A statutory vesting order under a complete adjudicatory scheme could not be reviewed in the absence of express legislative authority, because review is not an inherent power and final orders under the Act had attained conclusiveness. The later review orders were therefore without jurisdiction. Although lack of jurisdiction is not cured by waiver, writ relief under article 226 remained discretionary, and petitioners who had allowed the original order to become final and themselves invoked an unauthorised review process were not entitled to certiorari. The High Court's interference was unsustainable and the original statutory orders stood restored in effect. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172627