https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172624 A Collector exercising revisional power under section 76A cannot reopen a matter after having already declined interference, because that determination is final absent a statutory review power. The amendment to section 32 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is described as protecting tenants' statutory purchase rights and saving only ejectment applications filed on or before 31 March 1957; later applications are outside the saving clause and become incompetent once the amendment operates. An ejectment order based on a post-31 March 1957 application is therefore unsustainable, while any later revisional order made without jurisdiction is liable to be quashed. en-us Thu, 03 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:36:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172624 A Collector exercising revisional power under section 76A cannot reopen a matter after having already declined interference, because that determination is final absent a statutory review power. The amendment to section 32 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is described as protecting tenants' statutory purchase rights and saving only ejectment applications filed on or before 31 March 1957; later applications are outside the saving clause and become incompetent once the amendment operates. An ejectment order based on a post-31 March 1957 application is therefore unsustainable, while any later revisional order made without jurisdiction is liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172624