<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 801 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172621</link>
    <description>In a central excise matter, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition after hearing counsel for the petitioner, leaving the underlying dispute undisturbed. No substantive legal principle or reasoned determination is recorded in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 801 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172621</link>
      <description>In a central excise matter, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition after hearing counsel for the petitioner, leaving the underlying dispute undisturbed. No substantive legal principle or reasoned determination is recorded in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>