<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 316 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172620</link>
    <description>Courts cannot compel the State to create a particular statutory admissions body where education admissions are governed by executive power in the absence of legislation; the selection challenge on that ground therefore failed. The reconstituted competent authority&#039;s work was not invalidated by the absence of one member or by committee assistance, because it was not a statutory tribunal and no prejudice was shown; that objection was rejected. The written test, viva voce, reservation policy, tie-breaking method and seat allocation were upheld as objective and consistent with the applicable executive orders, and no arbitrariness or material prejudice was established. The High Court judgment was set aside, the selections were upheld, and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:10:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 316 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172620</link>
      <description>Courts cannot compel the State to create a particular statutory admissions body where education admissions are governed by executive power in the absence of legislation; the selection challenge on that ground therefore failed. The reconstituted competent authority&#039;s work was not invalidated by the absence of one member or by committee assistance, because it was not a statutory tribunal and no prejudice was shown; that objection was rejected. The written test, viva voce, reservation policy, tie-breaking method and seat allocation were upheld as objective and consistent with the applicable executive orders, and no arbitrariness or material prejudice was established. The High Court judgment was set aside, the selections were upheld, and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>