<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 556 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172618</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Orissa High Court&#039;s decision, ruling that the policy decision of allotting quarters on a rotational basis by the State was legal. The Court emphasized that judicial review of administrative action should not interfere with government policy decisions unless they contravene statutory provisions, fundamental rights, or constitutional provisions. The Court clarified that the Orissa Administrative Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction is limited to matters covered by specific rules and regulations, and reiterated that the Court should not act as an appellate authority over policy decisions unless fundamental rights are infringed. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, concluding the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 556 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172618</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Orissa High Court&#039;s decision, ruling that the policy decision of allotting quarters on a rotational basis by the State was legal. The Court emphasized that judicial review of administrative action should not interfere with government policy decisions unless they contravene statutory provisions, fundamental rights, or constitutional provisions. The Court clarified that the Orissa Administrative Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction is limited to matters covered by specific rules and regulations, and reiterated that the Court should not act as an appellate authority over policy decisions unless fundamental rights are infringed. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, concluding the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>