<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 356 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172617</link>
    <description>Where connected suits are tried together on common issues, a decree in one suit attains finality if no appeal is filed against it, and that finality cannot be bypassed in the appeal from the other suit. The earlier determination on the common issue becomes conclusive, so Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applies and bars re-agitation of that finding. On that basis, the challenge to the same issue in the connected appeal was not maintainable and failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:50:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 356 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172617</link>
      <description>Where connected suits are tried together on common issues, a decree in one suit attains finality if no appeal is filed against it, and that finality cannot be bypassed in the appeal from the other suit. The earlier determination on the common issue becomes conclusive, so Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applies and bars re-agitation of that finding. On that basis, the challenge to the same issue in the connected appeal was not maintainable and failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>