<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1041 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172609</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the civil matters was condoned, and the Supreme Court thereafter dismissed the proceedings. The text records only the procedural disposition and does not state any substantive central excise issue or legal principle decided on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1041 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172609</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the civil matters was condoned, and the Supreme Court thereafter dismissed the proceedings. The text records only the procedural disposition and does not state any substantive central excise issue or legal principle decided on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>