<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1062 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172608</link>
    <description>The civil appeal was dismissed for delay, and the Supreme Court left the question of law open. No substantive determination on the central excise dispute was made, and the order does not decide the underlying legal issue on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1062 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172608</link>
      <description>The civil appeal was dismissed for delay, and the Supreme Court left the question of law open. No substantive determination on the central excise dispute was made, and the order does not decide the underlying legal issue on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>