<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 253 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172606</link>
    <description>Murder may be proved by reliable direct or circumstantial evidence even without recovery of the corpus delicti; here, witness recovery evidence, identification, inquest material and medical opinion together established the body&#039;s identity and homicidal death. An approver is a competent witness, but prudence requires corroboration in material particulars; the approver&#039;s account was supported by independent evidence on the deceased&#039;s movements, lodge stay, body recovery, stabbing and sale of the stolen chain, making it safe to act upon. In sentencing, the Court considered the planned, cold-blooded and gain-motivated nature of the murders and treated the hearing under section 235(2) CrPC as not vitiating the capital sentence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:22:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 253 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172606</link>
      <description>Murder may be proved by reliable direct or circumstantial evidence even without recovery of the corpus delicti; here, witness recovery evidence, identification, inquest material and medical opinion together established the body&#039;s identity and homicidal death. An approver is a competent witness, but prudence requires corroboration in material particulars; the approver&#039;s account was supported by independent evidence on the deceased&#039;s movements, lodge stay, body recovery, stabbing and sale of the stolen chain, making it safe to act upon. In sentencing, the Court considered the planned, cold-blooded and gain-motivated nature of the murders and treated the hearing under section 235(2) CrPC as not vitiating the capital sentence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>