<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1010 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263093</link>
    <description>The Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order, reducing the pre-deposit amount to Rs. 6,65,81,395 related to credit denied on capital goods. The appellant was directed to pay 50% within four weeks and the remaining 50% within another four weeks, considering their financial hardship. The Court found merit in the appellant&#039;s claim and referenced relevant High Court decisions in justifying the adjustment. The Tribunal&#039;s order was deemed unsustainable in its entirety and required modification to balance financial considerations with Revenue interests. The appeals were allowed with the adjusted terms for pre-deposit, closing the connected Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1010 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263093</link>
      <description>The Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order, reducing the pre-deposit amount to Rs. 6,65,81,395 related to credit denied on capital goods. The appellant was directed to pay 50% within four weeks and the remaining 50% within another four weeks, considering their financial hardship. The Court found merit in the appellant&#039;s claim and referenced relevant High Court decisions in justifying the adjustment. The Tribunal&#039;s order was deemed unsustainable in its entirety and required modification to balance financial considerations with Revenue interests. The appeals were allowed with the adjusted terms for pre-deposit, closing the connected Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>