https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263089 The appellant successfully argued that the services provided did not constitute Business Auxiliary Services, as the commissions received were not tied to facilitating loans for the banks. The Tribunal referenced the case law of Pagariya Auto Center vs. CCE, Aurangabad and emphasized the necessity of clear evidence to establish taxability. Consequently, the appellant's appeal was allowed, granting them relief. en-us Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263089 The appellant successfully argued that the services provided did not constitute Business Auxiliary Services, as the commissions received were not tied to facilitating loans for the banks. The Tribunal referenced the case law of Pagariya Auto Center vs. CCE, Aurangabad and emphasized the necessity of clear evidence to establish taxability. Consequently, the appellant's appeal was allowed, granting them relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263089