<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1005 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263088</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Tribunal erred in requiring the appellants to reverse Input Tax Credits claimed on purchases and in penalizing them for allegedly filing false returns. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and the orders of the VATO and OHA, allowing the appeals with costs of Rs. 10,000 in each case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1005 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263088</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Tribunal erred in requiring the appellants to reverse Input Tax Credits claimed on purchases and in penalizing them for allegedly filing false returns. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and the orders of the VATO and OHA, allowing the appeals with costs of Rs. 10,000 in each case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>