https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263084 The appeal was dismissed without examination on merits because the nominal tax effect was non-recurring in nature, and that ground alone was sufficient for disposal. No substantive issue of central excise law was decided, as the Court declined to engage with the merits of the dispute. en-us Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:17:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263084 The appeal was dismissed without examination on merits because the nominal tax effect was non-recurring in nature, and that ground alone was sufficient for disposal. No substantive issue of central excise law was decided, as the Court declined to engage with the merits of the dispute. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263084