<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 905 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172604</link>
    <description>During pendency of writ proceedings, a court may sustain an interim enhancement of rent where the figure is fixed after hearing both parties and reflects a reasonable market-based assessment of the premises. The absence of a separate valuation report does not, by itself, render the order infirm. In this matter, the shops were in a commercial location on a main highway, the earlier rent was found to be well below prevailing market levels, and the enhanced rent was treated as just, proper, and commensurate with the locality. Interference with the interim order was declined, the appeal failed, and costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 905 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172604</link>
      <description>During pendency of writ proceedings, a court may sustain an interim enhancement of rent where the figure is fixed after hearing both parties and reflects a reasonable market-based assessment of the premises. The absence of a separate valuation report does not, by itself, render the order infirm. In this matter, the shops were in a commercial location on a main highway, the earlier rent was found to be well below prevailing market levels, and the enhanced rent was treated as just, proper, and commensurate with the locality. Interference with the interim order was declined, the appeal failed, and costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>