<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 996 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263079</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 20 lakhs for hearing the appeal. The Court emphasized that conditions imposed should be reasonable and consistent with the relief sought. The Court found the deposit condition unjustified and restored the appeal for proper hearing, without expressing any opinion on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 996 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263079</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 20 lakhs for hearing the appeal. The Court emphasized that conditions imposed should be reasonable and consistent with the relief sought. The Court found the deposit condition unjustified and restored the appeal for proper hearing, without expressing any opinion on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>