<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 992 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263075</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee had a reasonable cause for the cash loan, which was genuine and properly recorded. The application of Section 273B was deemed appropriate, and thus, no penalty under Section 271D was deemed necessary. The department&#039;s appeals were dismissed as no significant legal issues were identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 992 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263075</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee had a reasonable cause for the cash loan, which was genuine and properly recorded. The application of Section 273B was deemed appropriate, and thus, no penalty under Section 271D was deemed necessary. The department&#039;s appeals were dismissed as no significant legal issues were identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>