<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 985 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263068</link>
    <description>The High Court condoned a 35-day delay in re-filing the appeal, disposing of the application. The Court allowed the Assessee&#039;s claim to treat embezzled funds as bad debts, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the loss. The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal as no substantial question of law arose regarding the interpretation of business loss under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:14:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 985 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263068</link>
      <description>The High Court condoned a 35-day delay in re-filing the appeal, disposing of the application. The Court allowed the Assessee&#039;s claim to treat embezzled funds as bad debts, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the loss. The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal as no substantial question of law arose regarding the interpretation of business loss under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>