<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 972 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under section 69C of the IT Act, as the transaction was declared null and void by the Civil Judge, Ghaziabad, and lacked evidence of the alleged cash transaction. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 972 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under section 69C of the IT Act, as the transaction was declared null and void by the Civil Judge, Ghaziabad, and lacked evidence of the alleged cash transaction. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>