https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263047 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI decided to adjourn the case to a specified date after noting repeated adjournments due to the personal difficulty of the advocate representing the appellant. Despite an earlier partial stay granted, the tribunal emphasized the need for timely and diligent conduct during legal proceedings. The appellant was warned that further delays would not be entertained, allowing the Revenue to recover the adjudged liability. This decision underscored the importance of adhering to scheduled hearings and avoiding unnecessary delays in legal proceedings to ensure the efficient resolution of the matter. en-us Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263047 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI decided to adjourn the case to a specified date after noting repeated adjournments due to the personal difficulty of the advocate representing the appellant. Despite an earlier partial stay granted, the tribunal emphasized the need for timely and diligent conduct during legal proceedings. The appellant was warned that further delays would not be entertained, allowing the Revenue to recover the adjudged liability. This decision underscored the importance of adhering to scheduled hearings and avoiding unnecessary delays in legal proceedings to ensure the efficient resolution of the matter. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263047