<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (10) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172602</link>
    <description>The constitutional scheme for requisitioning or acquiring property recognises not only Union purpose and State purpose, but also a distinct category of any other public purpose. A restrictive ejusdem generis reading that would confine &quot;any other public purpose&quot; to a State purpose was rejected because it would make the expression redundant. Accommodation of a foreign consulate staff member was not treated as a Union purpose merely because consular matters fall within Union competence, since providing a room for staff is not the same as providing consular representation. The analysis states that requisition for such a public purpose can remain within State competence as a State purpose or another public purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:09:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (10) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172602</link>
      <description>The constitutional scheme for requisitioning or acquiring property recognises not only Union purpose and State purpose, but also a distinct category of any other public purpose. A restrictive ejusdem generis reading that would confine &quot;any other public purpose&quot; to a State purpose was rejected because it would make the expression redundant. Accommodation of a foreign consulate staff member was not treated as a Union purpose merely because consular matters fall within Union competence, since providing a room for staff is not the same as providing consular representation. The analysis states that requisition for such a public purpose can remain within State competence as a State purpose or another public purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>