https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172594 An application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure is not maintainable once the suit has been decreed where the alleged breach concerns an undertaking or injunction that has merged into the decree. In that situation, enforcement must ordinarily be pursued through execution under Order XXI Rule 32, which provides the proper mechanism for a decree of injunction. The text also states that criminal contempt requires more than a private dispute over compliance with a civil decree: wilful breach of an undertaking may support civil contempt, but criminal contempt depends on a clear obstruction of the administration of justice affecting public interest. On these facts, the contempt route was treated as unavailable. en-us Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Aug 2025 13:22:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172594 An application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure is not maintainable once the suit has been decreed where the alleged breach concerns an undertaking or injunction that has merged into the decree. In that situation, enforcement must ordinarily be pursued through execution under Order XXI Rule 32, which provides the proper mechanism for a decree of injunction. The text also states that criminal contempt requires more than a private dispute over compliance with a civil decree: wilful breach of an undertaking may support civil contempt, but criminal contempt depends on a clear obstruction of the administration of justice affecting public interest. On these facts, the contempt route was treated as unavailable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172594