<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 706 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172581</link>
    <description>Earlier Supreme Court decisions on the identical question were treated as binding precedent, and the revenue conceded that the issue was already concluded against it. Those adverse rulings were accepted as determinative of the present appeal, so no separate examination of the merits was undertaken. The appeal was therefore dismissed, with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 706 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172581</link>
      <description>Earlier Supreme Court decisions on the identical question were treated as binding precedent, and the revenue conceded that the issue was already concluded against it. Those adverse rulings were accepted as determinative of the present appeal, so no separate examination of the merits was undertaken. The appeal was therefore dismissed, with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>