https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172580 The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by allowing a writ petition challenging the termination of services solely on the ground of improper notice service. Emphasizing limited interference under Article 226, the Supreme Court stated that such intervention is warranted only in cases of miscarriage of justice or legal error, not to re-evaluate evidence. The respondent, aware of the inquiry against him, chose not to participate, waiving his right to claim violation of natural justice principles. The Tribunal's decision to dismiss the respondent's application was upheld, and the High Court's order was set aside. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:31:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172580 The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by allowing a writ petition challenging the termination of services solely on the ground of improper notice service. Emphasizing limited interference under Article 226, the Supreme Court stated that such intervention is warranted only in cases of miscarriage of justice or legal error, not to re-evaluate evidence. The respondent, aware of the inquiry against him, chose not to participate, waiving his right to claim violation of natural justice principles. The Tribunal's decision to dismiss the respondent's application was upheld, and the High Court's order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172580