https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172571 A post-commencement amendment that effectively withdrew an already operating uniform school education scheme was treated as manifestly arbitrary and unconstitutional. The Court noted that the parent scheme had been implemented in phases, earlier judicial approvals stood on record, and the State already had sufficient statutory machinery to address defects without scrapping the scheme. It further held that a legislature cannot nullify final judicial decisions by merely changing the form of the law, and that conferring unfettered power on the Government to decide the commencement date amounted to an impermissible abdication of legislative function. The earlier statutory regime therefore continued to operate. en-us Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172571 A post-commencement amendment that effectively withdrew an already operating uniform school education scheme was treated as manifestly arbitrary and unconstitutional. The Court noted that the parent scheme had been implemented in phases, earlier judicial approvals stood on record, and the State already had sufficient statutory machinery to address defects without scrapping the scheme. It further held that a legislature cannot nullify final judicial decisions by merely changing the form of the law, and that conferring unfettered power on the Government to decide the commencement date amounted to an impermissible abdication of legislative function. The earlier statutory regime therefore continued to operate. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172571