<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1371 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172569</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled that teachers appointed without the required qualifications and proper procedures cannot avail benefits like grant-in-aid or UGC pay scales. It emphasized adherence to academic standards and fair appointment processes. The Court directed state authorities to assess cases individually and provide benefits only from the date of meeting qualifications, highlighting the importance of upholding educational quality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1371 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172569</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled that teachers appointed without the required qualifications and proper procedures cannot avail benefits like grant-in-aid or UGC pay scales. It emphasized adherence to academic standards and fair appointment processes. The Court directed state authorities to assess cases individually and provide benefits only from the date of meeting qualifications, highlighting the importance of upholding educational quality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>