https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172566 A no-confidence motion under the U.P. Municipalities Act was treated as applicable to a President elected directly by the electorate because the statutory scheme created no distinction between election modes beyond the method of election, and the Board's power of removal remained part of the integrated municipal structure. The accompanying consequences under Section 47-A were also held to operate. The article further notes that reducing the period for moving a no-confidence motion from two years to one year was regarded as a legislative policy choice, not arbitrary or violative of Article 14, in the absence of demonstrated unconstitutionality. en-us Fri, 15 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 12:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172566 A no-confidence motion under the U.P. Municipalities Act was treated as applicable to a President elected directly by the electorate because the statutory scheme created no distinction between election modes beyond the method of election, and the Board's power of removal remained part of the integrated municipal structure. The accompanying consequences under Section 47-A were also held to operate. The article further notes that reducing the period for moving a no-confidence motion from two years to one year was regarded as a legislative policy choice, not arbitrary or violative of Article 14, in the absence of demonstrated unconstitutionality. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172566